State College Casino Hearing Set, Cordish to Make Case Against Bally’s Project
Posted on: January 14, 2023, 11:15h.
Last updated on: January 14, 2023, 06:58h.
The State College casino project that many locals oppose — and the College Township Council has expressed remorse for allowing to proceed — will be discussed in Harrisburg on Jan. 25 before the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB).
State College is being targeted for a Category 4 satellite casino. Authorized through the state’s 2017 gaming expansion package, the venues — also known as “mini-casinos” — are to be tethered to a larger full-scale Category 1 (racetrack) or Category 2 (standalone) casino.
The Gaming Control Board held several auction rounds for the state’s current casinos to bid on Category 4 licenses. The auctions came after local towns and municipalities were afforded the right to opt-out of being considered for a mini-casino.
College Township, which encompasses parts of State College and University Park, home to Penn State University’s main campus, where about 46,000 undergrads and 6,400 postgraduates study, did not remove its candidacy from the Category 4 bidding pool.
Ira Lubert is a Penn State alumnus and former trustee. He qualified to bid on the PGCB’s September 2020 auction round because he owns a 3% stake in Rivers Casino Pittsburgh. He won the auction round with a $10 million bid. Key individual owners in Category 1 and 2 casinos were welcomed to participate in later Category 4 auction rounds after interest waned and bidding went dry from the Category 1 and 2 casinos.
Lubert selected College Township for his casino. But Stadium Casino, LLC, an entity controlled by Baltimore-based Cordish Companies, has legally fought Lubert’s casino plan nearly since he won the Sept. 2020 auction.
Cordish to Make Its Case
Soon after Lubert secured the Category 4 license rights for College Township by paying the state $10,000,101, his official bid, the businessman announced Bally’s was joining the project. The partnership — SC Gaming OpCo, LLC — plans to spend $123 million to transform the former Macy’s department store at the Nittany Mall into a Bally’s casino with up to 750 slot machines, 30 table games, and a sportsbook.
Cordish contends that Lubert violated PGCB rules and state laws by orchestrating a scheme with Bally’s before the auction. The state mandated that only companies and key investors who have “an ownership interest in a slot machine license” in the commonwealth qualified to bid during the Sept. 2020 auction. Bally’s has no gaming license of any kind in Pennsylvania.
The PGCB in December agreed to allow Cordish to intervene in the matter. Cordish was outbid by Lubert. Cordish operates Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia and Live! Casino Pittsburgh, the latter being a satellite venue.
On Jan. 25, Cordish attorneys will present their case to the PGCB as to why the state should not approve the Bally’s State College casino plan. The board says Cordish will have about 15 minutes to present its argument.
The hearing will also include input from SC Gaming OpCo and the PGCB’s Office of Enforcement Counsel. Lubert has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, and likened Cordish’s complaint to “sour grapes.”
Vote Possible
PGCB spokesperson Doug Harbach said an agenda item for a licensing vote on the Bally’s project will be included. That’s to allow the Board to vote on the proposal, should they feel comfortable. But at this time, the odds of a vote happening seem long.
It’s largely expected that the dispute will eventually end up in court through an appeal. Cordish attorneys believe the disagreement is best suited for a courtroom.
Related News Articles
Most Popular
UPDATE: Former Resorts World & MGM Grand Prez Loses Gaming License
Jackpot News Roundup: Two Major Holiday Wins at California’s Sky River Casino
Oakland A’s Prez Resigns, Raising Questions About Las Vegas Move
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Traveling Welcome to Las Vegas Sign
MGM Osaka to Begin Construction on Main Resort Structure in April 2025
Most Commented
-
UPDATE: Whiskey Pete’s Casino Near Las Vegas Closes
December 20, 2024 — 33 Comments— -
Zillow: Town Outside Las Vegas Named the Most Popular Retirement City in 2024
December 26, 2024 — 31 Comments— -
Caesars Virginia in Danville Now Accepting Hotel Room Reservations
November 27, 2024 — 9 Comments— -
Oakland A’s Prez Resigns, Raising Questions About Las Vegas Move
December 27, 2024 — 9 Comments—
Last Comments ( 201 )
Clearly, the cons of bringing a casino to a college town outweigh the pros (unless you are the developer). Research should drive decision making; the considerable negative aspects of gambling on community are facts. My vote is NO.
We are vehemently opposed to the idea of planting an attractive nuisance almost within walking distance of thousands of impressionable young college students. It is regrettable that township representatives stumbled into a poorly researched decision which they now find to be irreversible. Nevertheless, the PGBC is in a position to undo the damage. They MUST stop this madness. Merlin C. and Mildred K. Ritz, State College
There are many well-documented harmful effects of casinos on the surrounding communities. Public commentary has established that our area does not want one. (Unfortunately, a PSU trustee has a financial stake in the proposed casino, and College Township now regrets not opposing it.) There are possibilities for the mall space that would benefit the community. Do NOT import a gambling den near thousands of student in a community that has repeatedly said NO. Phyllis Gardener
This proposed "gaming" casino does actually threaten us as a plague would. If it comes into existence it will inevitably bring our community great sorrow, illness and suicide. We beg you not to proceed.
My perception of this casino is purely for the enrichment of those for it and those funding it. It will in effect take money from those already in poverty or from families that need it. It will bring nothing for those utilizing it’s addictive behaviors. Not to mention it opens doors for human trafficking and other problems to break apart families. We need in its place good and productive entities, things that are positive and do no harm. Let’s make the right choice for our community at large and not for big profits for those who want to get rich at the expense of those susceptible to addictions.
College Township did not properly notify the public and solicit feedback about this proposal last year, and instead rammed through a vote against the interests of our community. Since then, thousands of community members have spoken out against the proposed casino in the strongest possible terms. Centre County, State College, and Penn State would be irreparably damaged by a casino in State College. The social science research is clear on this. As a professor, mother, and concerned resident, I urge the PGCB to listen to the string wishes of the community and deny the license.
This is a horrible and destructive idea for this community on every level. Gambling and attendant drinking, crime, etc., have NO place in a college town!
We used to have a shopping mall that was an asset to the community. Now we will have two gun stores and a casino. Please, No No No
As a longtime resident of State College I am deeply concerned about the opening of a casino, and all its trappings, here in Centre County! Why not enlarge the senior center or open this space up for children’s parties/sports venue? There are so many concrete ways of using this space that would be of benefit to Centre County!!! Please rethink the issue!
The family-friendly atmosphere and university-community relations have weathered and survived so, so much. Lubert, Cordish, Bally’s… we don’t want it!! PGCB… Please!! Keep the casino O-U-T!!!!
Absolutely not! We retired back to the Penn State to enjoy a small town, clean atmosphere, and safe community. Most individuals drawn to a casino do not have the funds to gamble. It is way too addictive. We live just down the street from the mall and will most definitely move if a casino is brought in.
No to the casino. A million times “NO”. Our wonderful community will pay a tremendous price to line this pockets of the already wealthy.
I will never understand why an alumni would want to bring a casino to our lovely community of families and students, unless they had a bad university experience and hope to damage the vicinity. A casino in State College would be a step in the wrong direction and truly a tragedy for the area. “Casinos do not revive local economies. They act as parasites upon them. Communities located within 10 miles of a casino exhibit double the rate of problem gambling. Unsurprisingly, such communities also suffer higher rates of home foreclosure and other forms of economic distress and domestic violence.”
Research has shown so many harmful effects on a community with the presence of a casino. To target college students and make them vulnerable to gambling addictions is contrary to what we want for our students at PSU. I strongly oppose the presence of a casino in or near our town.
A casino would do great harm to our community.