State College Casino Hearing Set, Cordish to Make Case Against Bally’s Project
Posted on: January 14, 2023, 11:15h.
Last updated on: January 14, 2023, 06:58h.
The State College casino project that many locals oppose — and the College Township Council has expressed remorse for allowing to proceed — will be discussed in Harrisburg on Jan. 25 before the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB).
State College is being targeted for a Category 4 satellite casino. Authorized through the state’s 2017 gaming expansion package, the venues — also known as “mini-casinos” — are to be tethered to a larger full-scale Category 1 (racetrack) or Category 2 (standalone) casino.
The Gaming Control Board held several auction rounds for the state’s current casinos to bid on Category 4 licenses. The auctions came after local towns and municipalities were afforded the right to opt-out of being considered for a mini-casino.
College Township, which encompasses parts of State College and University Park, home to Penn State University’s main campus, where about 46,000 undergrads and 6,400 postgraduates study, did not remove its candidacy from the Category 4 bidding pool.
Ira Lubert is a Penn State alumnus and former trustee. He qualified to bid on the PGCB’s September 2020 auction round because he owns a 3% stake in Rivers Casino Pittsburgh. He won the auction round with a $10 million bid. Key individual owners in Category 1 and 2 casinos were welcomed to participate in later Category 4 auction rounds after interest waned and bidding went dry from the Category 1 and 2 casinos.
Lubert selected College Township for his casino. But Stadium Casino, LLC, an entity controlled by Baltimore-based Cordish Companies, has legally fought Lubert’s casino plan nearly since he won the Sept. 2020 auction.
Cordish to Make Its Case
Soon after Lubert secured the Category 4 license rights for College Township by paying the state $10,000,101, his official bid, the businessman announced Bally’s was joining the project. The partnership — SC Gaming OpCo, LLC — plans to spend $123 million to transform the former Macy’s department store at the Nittany Mall into a Bally’s casino with up to 750 slot machines, 30 table games, and a sportsbook.
Cordish contends that Lubert violated PGCB rules and state laws by orchestrating a scheme with Bally’s before the auction. The state mandated that only companies and key investors who have “an ownership interest in a slot machine license” in the commonwealth qualified to bid during the Sept. 2020 auction. Bally’s has no gaming license of any kind in Pennsylvania.
The PGCB in December agreed to allow Cordish to intervene in the matter. Cordish was outbid by Lubert. Cordish operates Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia and Live! Casino Pittsburgh, the latter being a satellite venue.
On Jan. 25, Cordish attorneys will present their case to the PGCB as to why the state should not approve the Bally’s State College casino plan. The board says Cordish will have about 15 minutes to present its argument.
The hearing will also include input from SC Gaming OpCo and the PGCB’s Office of Enforcement Counsel. Lubert has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, and likened Cordish’s complaint to “sour grapes.”
Vote Possible
PGCB spokesperson Doug Harbach said an agenda item for a licensing vote on the Bally’s project will be included. That’s to allow the Board to vote on the proposal, should they feel comfortable. But at this time, the odds of a vote happening seem long.
It’s largely expected that the dispute will eventually end up in court through an appeal. Cordish attorneys believe the disagreement is best suited for a courtroom.
Related News Articles
Most Popular
UPDATE: Former Resorts World & MGM Grand Prez Loses Gaming License
Jackpot News Roundup: Two Major Holiday Wins at California’s Sky River Casino
Oakland A’s Prez Resigns, Raising Questions About Las Vegas Move
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Traveling Welcome to Las Vegas Sign
MGM Osaka to Begin Construction on Main Resort Structure in April 2025
Most Commented
-
UPDATE: Whiskey Pete’s Casino Near Las Vegas Closes
December 20, 2024 — 33 Comments— -
Zillow: Town Outside Las Vegas Named the Most Popular Retirement City in 2024
December 26, 2024 — 31 Comments— -
Oakland A’s Prez Resigns, Raising Questions About Las Vegas Move
December 27, 2024 — 9 Comments— -
Caesars Virginia in Danville Now Accepting Hotel Room Reservations
November 27, 2024 — 9 Comments—
Last Comments ( 201 )
NO! A Casino is a TERRIBLE thing to bring to Happy Valley! DO NOT RUIN OUR BEAUTIFUL AREA and YOUTH with a gambling casino and all that it generates.
We live 1 mile from the proposed site. PSU is 4 miles away and this proposed casino has generated SO much opposition. It is not in the best interest of anyone except the investors who will profit.
I do not support a casino at the Nittany Mall and will never support a casino in our community. Please do not allow a casino to invade our community. Please do not allow those with money to override the desire of the majority of the community feedback. No casino!!!
I'm an alumnus of Penn State and really worry about what a casino would do to the social scene there. State College, as its name suggests, isn't a regular city -- it has a disproportionate amount of inexperienced college kids who can easily make big mistakes, and ruin their potential in later life. It's also in a rural area with a lot of beautiful and fragile scenery. I hope that the casino will not be built.
Of all the ideas to improve the State College area, a casino is one of the most foolish. A casino will increase crime, drugs, political corruption, while decreasing the public welfare including real estate values. What a distraction to students, both college and high school! What a draw for the riff raff of society! A casino in State College? NO NO NO
A casino will not benefit our community, it will only bring harmful, destructive and dangerous issues. Do not allow greed to ruin our county. PGCB please say no to a casino in Centre County.
This is not the place for a casino. It's clear that a small, university-town atmosphere is what the community prefers. Even so we have our share of drinking and drug problems now, we don't need another addiction-developing business. M
I am opposed to the Nittany Mall Casino plan. It is not appropriate for a college town. PGCB please keep the casino out of State College.
There is abundant research that spells out just how dangerous casinos can be to college-aged students. State College does not need a casino to be located less than four miles away from the PSU University Park campus. Beyond the potential detrimental effects that a casino can pose for college students, there is ample research, both popular and academic, that spells out countess other negatives that a casino brings to communities. The negatives far far outweigh the positives. Please, no casino here. The space at the Nittany Mall should be repurposed for the benefit of our entire community.
My family and I have been following this story for the past year and are opposed to a casino coming to Centre Co. As many people have commented, there is already a drinking problem, and we don’t need the added temptations of a gambling venue located near a big sports town. I recently was in the mall for the first time after Covid started. The senior center is widely used and many people walk inside in inclement weather. There’s also now a fencing academy and a dancing school. We met family at the pizza place, which recently opened after sitting empty after another long time pizza restaurant closed. The mall is becoming more of a community center and a casino does not fit in with this atmosphere.
As an attender at a few of the community meetings about this, it's hard to overstate the community opposition to this casino. The residents of State College and surrounding towns are absolutely opposed to this for many reasons: an increase in addiction and therefore economic hardship and family issues, a rise in drunken driving, decrease of property values and an overall decline of the community. This casino would absolutely do significantly more harm than good to this area and the State College community is adamantly against it. Stop the plans for the development of the casino!
Regardless of how the investors spin it, a casino will bring with it more bad than good. A college town is an inappropriate location. I strongly oppose its development in our region.
State College is absolutely an iconic community. It is well documented what the effects of a Casino can do to a community. Why...WHY would our community want or need this venture. We, as a community, will have accrued zero benefits as the ills certainly outweigh whatever benefits there might be. If people have gambling needs there are plenty of outlets for them in our day and age. Why install a gambling addiction into many innocent college age kids? It is a lose, lose venture for everyone (except the monied organizers)...The House ALWAYS WINS.
Casino's do not bring prosperity to communities but instead provide low paying jobs and are accompanied by a host of social problems that are detrimental to a small town. The only people to gain anything from this deal would the money-grubbing corporate owners. The Township doesn't even have their own police force and would be a burden on the surrounding municipalities that provide police services. I am very against this proposal as is everyone I have talked to.
A college town is the worst place for a casino. Students should come to college to learn and grow, not to develop gambling addictions. It's particularly gross that someone affiliated with the university, who should know better and have the best interests of our students and town at heart, would try to make money at the expense of the students' well-being. With high tuition prices, college students struggle too much already. If even a few students who are struggling to pay their bills decide to try to gamble to win the money, that's a few too many.